In this webinar, Earlene Biggs, MA, shares market research of the best practices and preferences for sharing information with healthcare decision-makers, which is validated by payer experts Gary Owens, MD, and Renee Fleming, RPh, MBA. 

Highlights

  • How US health care decision makers seek out new information
  • Ideal formats for information sharing
  • Preferred types of information and the role of stakeholders in decision-making

Webinar Summary

Earlene begins with a brief overview of results from a survey which asked health care decision-makers their ideal formats for seeking and sharing information, as well as the types of information they prefer receiving. Much like the rest of the population, most payers and institutional providers prefer using the internet to learn about various products and services (e.g., vaccinations, treatment plans, and diagnoses). Despite the shift to online services during the pandemic, many institutional customers still utilize direct mailing services to gain information, and prefer more traditional means of content.

There has been a remarkable increase in the desire for on-demand digital content like podcasts and webinars, as they are easily shareable and accessible on many devices. In coincidence with this shift toward on-demand content, the preferred sources of information for health care decision-makers are also changing. While manufacturer websites, print journals, and professional webinars are still favored by many, those in more patient-focused roles also increasingly use virtual voice assistants to gain information.

Earlene also notes that the timing for meeting with representatives has not changed much since the pandemic, with most surveyed individuals preferring to meet every three to six months. However, the desired meeting frequency increases six months before and after a new product launch. It is clear that health care decision-makers favor a multidisciplinary approach when receiving information.

“The expectation and the need within our health care decision-makers for a broader range of input is growing, and they’re looking for that multidisciplinary approach.”

Earlene next discusses the types of formats that are most ideal for sharing information with health care decision-makers. An increasing preference for digital formats was noted within the survey, with websites, digital presentations, and videos being highly useful for pharmaceutical representatives. Despite this, leave-behinds such as business cards or note pads continue to be highly valued and frequently used promotional materials. While most institutional providers and payers primarily use work laptops to search for information, they also increasingly use their smartphones and tablets to access information, further highlighting the need for readily-accessible, on-demand information. Earlene also notes that decision-makers are requesting patient quality of life data more frequently, as well as health equity data. 

To conclude this webinar, Earlene highlights a few main areas in which stakeholder engagement can be improved. For example, understanding stakeholder preferences and policies for both virtual and in-person engagements can be an invaluable asset for those seeking to improve engagement. Additionally, facilitating meaningful and impactful digital communication can improve a responsive user’s experience and hopefully result in additional communications. Lastly, implementing search engine optimization and marketing strategies is incredibly important as health care decision-makers move their communications online.

Click to watch the webinar recording. To view the presentation full screen simply click the square icon located in the bottom-right corner of the video-viewer.

Resources

Q&A

  • If resources are limited, what is the one thing that could be done to improve engagement?
  • What is the value of leave-behind information?

To retrieve a PDF copy of the presentation, click on the link below the slide player. From this page, click on the “Download” link to retrieve the file.

Presenters

VP, Market Research & Analytics
Pricing, Market Access and Reimbursement
ICON

Earlene Biggs leads the market research and business analytics team at ICON to support strategic decisions and business planning. She is responsible for primary research design, both qualitative and quantitative, and delivery of insights as well as the integration and analysis of syndicated data using appropriate methods and techniques.

VP
Pricing, Market Access and Reimbursement
ICON

Gary Owens is a payer expert and has more than 25 years of health plan experience in medical and pharmacy management at senior executive level.

Senior VP
Pricing, Market Access and Reimbursement
ICON

Renee has 20+ years experience within Managed Care in product & pricing/contracting strategy of pharmaceuticals, clinical assessment of pharmaceuticals in development/in-licensing vs. marketplace competition, medical & pharmacy policy surveillance and strategic consulting using payer research & reimbursement analysis.

Production Partner

ICON

ICON is a global provider of consulting, and outsourced development and commercialisation services to pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device and government and public health organisations. We focus our innovation on the factors that are critical to our clients - reducing time to market, reducing cost and increasing quality.

Additional Content From ICON

Social Media Data: Opportunities and Insights for Clinical Research

Social Media Data: Opportunities and Insights for Clinical Research

Hear four experts from ICON and Kap Code provide insights on how to collect, use, analyze, and interpret social media data in different contexts. These experts share knowledge from over fifteen years of successfully developing and adapting algorithms to treat this kind of data.

Additional Content From HealthEconomics.Com

Related Content